Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Wash. 2d 948 - Moon v. Phipps

67 Wash. 2d 948 - Moon v. Phipps’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
3
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably 93 Wash. 2d 881 - Liebergesell v. Evans (1980), 77 Wash. 2d 396 - Moss v. Vadman (1969)

2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

100196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stewart v. Preston · Collins v. Nelson · Watson v. Bayliss · Breedlove v. Holton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “loyalty demanded of an agent. . . creates a duty in the agent to deal with his principal's property solely for his principal's benefit in all matters connected with the agency.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““And the agent has the burden of proving in every case that his principal not only had knowledge that the agent was to be the buyer or seller, but also the burden of showing that all information in possession of the agent had been communicated to his principal prior to the giving of consent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “There must be additional circumstances, or a relationship that induces the trusting party to relax the care and vigilance which he would ordinarily exercise for his own protection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.