Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Wash. App. 180 - Powers v. Skagit County

67 Wash. App. 180 - Powers v. Skagit County’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council · Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc. · First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles · Nollan v. California Coastal Commission · Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the regulation is aimed at achieving a legitimate public purpose; (2) whether it uses means that are reasonably necessary to achieve that purpose; and (3) whether it is unduly oppressive on the landowner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.