67 Wash. App. 228 - State v. Stover’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably 71 Wash. App. 14 - State v. Stith (1993), 78 Wash. App. 717 - State v. Fiallo-Lopez (1995)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 115 Wash. 2d 609 - State v. Dennison · 110 Wash. 2d 504 - State v. Belgarde · 104 Wash. 2d 497 - State v. Smith · 61 Wash. App. 354 - State v. Casteneda-Perez · 60 Wash. App. 869 - State v. Barrow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`invite the jury to make reasonable inferences from the evidence so long as counsel does not express a personal opinion.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[g]reater latitude is given in closing argument than in cross examination”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“. State v. Reed, 102 Wn.2d 140, 147 , 684 P.2d 699 (1984) (quoting People v. Fielding, 158 N.Y. 542, 547 , 53 N.E. 497 (1899)). Cross examination designed to compel a witness to express an opinion as to whether other witnesses were lying constitutes misconduct. In addition, comments [in closing argument] calculated to appeal to the jury's passion and prejudice and encourage it to render a verdict on facts not in evidence are improper. (Citations omitted.) State v. Stover, 67 Wn. App. 228, 230-31 , 834 P.2d 671 (1992), review denied, 120 Wn.2d 1025 (1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.