67 Wash. App. 847 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2014
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · 104 Wash. 2d 412 - State v. Guloy · 111 Wash. 2d 124 - State v. Brown · 113 Wash. 2d 388 - State v. Fladebo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by a preponderance of the evidence that interjection of new facts into the case when the State has not acted with due diligence will compel him to choose between prejudicing either of these rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cannon“that the rule of Price is not an absolute bar to granting a continuance beyond the speedy trial period to enable the defense to address new discovery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hoffman“the question of whether dismissal is an appropriate remedy is a fact-specific determination that must be resolved on a case-by-case basis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hoffman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.