67 Wash. App. 921 - State v. Craven’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 118 Wash. 2d 151 - State v. Hopper · 119 Wash. 2d 657 - State v. Davis · 36 Wash. App. 454 - State v. Krup
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) do the necessary facts appear in any form, or by fair construction can they be found, in the charging document; and, if so, (2) can the defendant show that he or she was nonetheless actually prejudiced by the inartful language which caused a lack of notice?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'not challenged until after the verdict will be more liberally construed in favor of validity than those challenged before or during trial.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The continuing validity of Robinson is doubtful in light of the Davis and Hopper decisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.