Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Wash. App. 949 - State v. Lowrimore

67 Wash. App. 949 - State v. Lowrimore’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2019

22 state decisions

150199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brinegar v. United States · Illinois v. Rodriguez · 95 Wash. 2d 898 - State v. Seagull · 67 Wash. App. 339 - State v. Lynn · 98 Wash. 2d 276 - Matter of Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “deliver, possess with intent to deliver, or manufacture with intent to deliver drug paraphernalia, knowing, or under circumstances where one reasonably should know, that it will be used to plant, propagate, cultivate, grow, harvest, manufacture, compound, convert, produce, process, prepare, test, analyze, pack, repack, store, contain, conceal, inject, ingest, inhale, or otherwise introduce into the human body a controlled substance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a substantial risk that physical harm will be inflicted by an individual upon another, as evidenced by behavior which has caused such harm or which places another person or persons in reasonable fear of sustaining such harm ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “RCW 69.50.412 does not, ipso facto, make possession of drug paraphernalia a crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.