67 Wis. 2d 102 - Goerke v. Vojvodich’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably 136 Wis. 2d 304 - Green Spring Farms v. Kersten (1987), 111 Wis. 2d 507 - Auric v. Continental Casualty Co. (1983)
8 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McCluskey v. Thranow · Leonard v. Springer · French Lumbering Co. v. Theriault · Scandrett v. Greenhouse · First National Bank in Oshkosh v. Scieszinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n attorney is personally liable to a third-party who sustains an injury in consequence of his [or her] wrongful act or improper exercise of authority where the attorney has been guilty of fraud or collusion, or of .. . malicious or tortious actfs], . ..”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]t is not necessary for a person to make oral misrepresentation[s] of fact in order to be guilty of fraudulent conduct,--such representations may be made by the acts or conduct of the party. The rule is stated in 1 Bigelow, Fraud, p. 467: 'any conduct capable of being turned into a statement of fact is a representation. There is no distinction between misrepresentations effected by words and misrepresentations effected by other acts.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““The elements of fraudulent misrepresentation are well established in the case law: First, there must be a false representation; second, it must be made with intent to defraud and for the purpose of inducing another to act upon it; and third, such other person must rely on it and be induced to act, to his injury or damage.” Goerke v. Vojvodich (1975), 67 Wis. 2d 102, 107 , 226 N. W. 2d 211 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.