Black v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
670 F.2d 108 · 1982
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2014
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Walters v. Flemming · 358 F. Supp. 1310 - Graves v. Richardson · Schulz v. State Compensation Department
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e need not and do not hold that every compromise of a workers' compensation claim is a substitute for periodic payments within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 424a(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Campbell v. Shalala“a commutation of, or a substitute for, periodic payments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hodge v. Shalala“on account of ... total or partial disability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.