Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 670 F.2d 143 - Clayton v. Douglas

Clayton v. Douglas’s Empirical Analysis

670 F.2d 143 · 1982

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
October 1993
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Pell v. Procunier · Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc. · In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Ramos v. Lamm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “regardless of how it is characterized, a post-judgment motion made within ten days of the entry of judgment that questions the correctness of a judgment is properly construed as a motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e),”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.