In the Matter of Jan Alf Assarsson, Relator-Appellant’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2018
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fernandez v. Phillips · Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Gibbons · Caplan v. Vokes · Freedman v. United States · In the Matter of Jan Alf Assarsson, Relator-Appellant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“deems the evidence sufficient to sustain the charge[s],”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Extradition is a multiphased process. It is initiated when a requesting nation asks the Secretary of State to extradite a fugitive. If the Secretary chooses to honor the request, he may initiate the necessary judicial extradition proceedings by requesting the Justice Department to file a verified extradition complaint in a court having personal jurisdiction over the fugitive. (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.