Williams v. Birkett’s Empirical Analysis
670 F.3d 729 · 2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · Christopher Artuz Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility v. Tony Bruce Bennett · Palmer v. Carlton · Robertson v. Simpson · Does v. Munoz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction ... review ... is pending.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ray v. Bauman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.