Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 212 Wis. 2d 417 - State v. Young (1997), Carter v. State (1998)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Cortez · United States v. Sokolow · Kolender v. Lawson · California v. Hodari D.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It appears then, that whether a defendant flees from police may determine whether there was reasonable suspicion for a stop. This is so because seizure of the individual does not occur until “the officer, by means of physical force or show of authority, has in some way restrained the liberty of a citizen.” [Terry, 392 U.S. at 20, n. 16 ( 88 S.Ct. 1868, n. 16 .)] The United States Supreme Court has subsequently interpreted that requirement in Terry to mean that seizure does not occur when the suspect fails to yield. California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. [621] at 624-26, 111 S.Ct. [1547] at 1550 [ 113 L.Ed.2d 690 at 695-697 ] [1991]. “It [seizure] does not remotely apply, however, to the prospect of a policeman yelling ‘Stop, in the name of the law!’ at a fleeing form that continues to flee.” Id. Thus, there can be no violation of the Fourth Amendment until a physical seizure of the person has been accomplished.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“we have previously 'adopted the Terry rationale in determining the legality of investigatory stops under Article 1, § 11 of the Indiana Constitution.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. W.H. v. State · WH v. State““an officer’s knowledge, experience and training, whether the conduct is observed in an area known for high crime, other actions of the persons involved, and whether it appears from the officer’s perspective that the subject is attempting to avoid the police after visual contact has been made.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carter v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.