Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2024
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Jackson v. Denno · Mincey v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“totality of all the surrounding circumstances both the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“it is the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Salazar v. State · Castro v. State“and forgiveness by confessing. He also appears to have told the defendant that, absent a confession, the detectives would work against him”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wood v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.