¶1Affirmed. See Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 86 S.Ct. 669, 15 L.Ed.2d 597 (1966); New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 271-280, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964); Demby v. English, 667 So.2d 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Pullum v. Johnson, 647 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), rev. denied, 654 So.2d 919 (1995); Saro Corp. v. Waterman Broadcasting Corp., 595 So.2d 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Cronley v. Pensacola News-Journal, Inc., 561 So.2d 402 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Della-Donna v. Gore Newspapers Co., 489 So.2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 494 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 1088, 107 S.Ct. 1294, 94 L.Ed.2d 150 (1987).
670 So. 2d 1027
Friedman v. Revell
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 28, 1996
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-02-28
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1997
1 state decisions
Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Rosenblatt v. Baer · United States v. Yellow Cab Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-02-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →