Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

670 So. 2d 1079

Docket No. 94-04397.

EY v. State

E.Y., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 20, 1996.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-03-20

Relies on HLL v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-03-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2012

12 state decisions

60199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Amy P. Thornhill, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee; Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Kimberly D. Nolen and Tracy L. Martinell, Assistant Attorneys General, Tampa, for Appellee.

¶3QUINCE, Judge.

¶4E.Y., a juvenile, challenges his adjudication and commitment for criminal mischief. Although we find no merit in his argument regarding his adjudication, we remand for resentencing.

¶5Appellant was found guilty of criminal mischief, in violation of section 806.13, Florida Statutes (1993). The order of commitment reflected two other offenses for which appellant was adjudicated delinquent, burglary and petit theft. The court imposed one general sentence for all three offenses. A general sentence for separate offenses is prohibited. H.L.L. v. State,595 So.2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Additionally, the maximum sentence for criminal mischief and petit theft is sixty days.

¶6We affirm the adjudication but remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion.

¶7BLUE, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur.

/670/so2d/1079 · .json · Public domain