Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 670 SO2D 1084 - Skyles v. State

Skyles v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1997
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Davis v. United States · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 596 So. 2d 957 - Traylor v. State · Owen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “DO THE PRINCIPLES ANNOUNCED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN DAVIS [v. UNITED STATES, 512 U.S. 452 , 114 S.Ct. 2350 , 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994)], APPLY TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF CONFESSIONS IN FLORIDA, IN LIGHT OF TRAYLOR [v. STATE, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla.1992)]?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.