Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 670 SO2D 1149 - Howard v. State

Howard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coney v. State · 548 So. 2d 1103 - Bull v. State · 668 So. 2d 1094 - Lett v. State · Dubois v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “DOES THE DECISION IN CONEY IV. STATE, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert, de nied,,-— U.S. , 116 S.Ct. 315 , 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995) ] APPLY TO “PIPELINE CASES,” THAT IS, THOSE OF SIMILARLY SITUATED DEFENDANTS WHOSE CASES WERE PENDING ON DIRECT REVIEW OR NOT YET FINAL DURING THE TIME CONEY WAS UNDER CONSIDERATION BUT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE OPINION?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.