State v. James’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 829 So. 2d 1166 - State v. Prudhomme (2002), 748 So. 2d 484 - State v. Francis (1999)
49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King · 428 So. 2d 444 - State v. Seiss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to prove that counsel was ineffective, the defendant must meet the two-pronged test enunciated by the Supreme Court. First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient. Second, the defendant must show that this deficiency prejudiced the outcome of the trial. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Brooks, 505 So.2d 714 (La.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct. 337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987).”
15 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sinegal · State v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.