Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 670 SO2D 543 - Hall v. Equitable Shipyard, Inc.

Hall v. Equitable Shipyard, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2018

13 state decisions

60199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lord Electric Co. v. United States · 591 So. 2d 342 - Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs · Terrell v. United States · Ruiz v. Shell Oil Co. · Melancon v. Amoco Production Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Who had control over the employee and the work he was performing beyond mere suggestion of details or cooperation? 2. Whose work was being performed? 3. Was there an agreement, understanding, or meeting of the minds between the original and the borrowing employer? 4. Did the employee acquiesce in the new work situation? 5. Did the original employer terminate his relationship with the employee? 6. Who furnished tools and place for performance? 7. Was the new employment over a considerable length of time? 8. Who had the right to discharge the employee? 9. Who had the obligation to pay the employee?”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “one whose existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiff's cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery, i.e., one that would matter on trial of the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.