Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 670 SW2D 828 - Jackson v. Commonwealth

Jackson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2017

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

1001984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The possession of stolen property is pri-ma facie evidence of guilt of theft of the property. Where there is a breaking and entering and property taken from a dwelling and the property is found in possession of the accused, such showing makes a submissible case for the-jury pn a charge of burglary.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “RCr 6.20 permits joinder of defendants for trial if they are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses. It is not authority for joinder of the trial of two or more defendants who are charged with the commission of separate acts or transactions constituting separate offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.