Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 670 S.W.2d 930 - Ohlendorf v. Feinstein

Ohlendorf v. Feinstein’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

1 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably Wulfing v. Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc. (1992), Iota Management Corp. v. Boulevard Investment Co. (1987)

1 district · 28 state decisions

1501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Coonis v. Rogers · Fohn v. Title Insurance Corp. of St. Louis · Smith v. Tracy · Ehrle v. Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““One whose wrongful conduct has rendered difficult the ascertainment of damages cannot escape liability because the damages cannot be measured with exactness.” [Citation omitted.] Further, where the fact of damage caused by a defendant’s wrongdoing is clear, “it is reasonable to require a lesser degree of certainty as to the amount of loss, leaving a greater degree of discretion to the jury, subject to the usual supervisory power of the court.” [Citation omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “reasonably certain by proof of actual facts, with present data for a rational estimate of their amount.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.