Stroik v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2020
1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · United States v. Turkette · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sitting as `both trier of fact and arbiter of law,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that the enterprise [is] separate and apart from the pattern of activity in which it engages.”). 26 . Multiple witnesses testified that Lloyd was”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lloyd v. State“the racketeering predicates are related, and that they amount to or pose a threat of continued criminal activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Reardon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.