Haft v. Haft’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2018
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Burkhart v. Davies · Katz v. Oak Industries Inc. · United Virginia Bank/Seaboard National v. B. F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust · In re the E. N. Chilson for a Summary Order for Election of Directors of Public Industrials Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“objective acts (words, acts and context)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A powerful argument can be advanced that generally the congruence of the right to vote and the residual rights of ownership will tend towards efficient wealth production.”); Commonwealth Assocs. v. Providence Health Care, 641 A.2d 155, 157 (Del.Ch. 1993) (Allen, C.) (noting law's historic concern about”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kurz v. Holbrook
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.