Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 671 F.2d 1104 - Robert M. ex rel. Renee K. v. Benton

Robert M. ex rel. Renee K. v. Benton’s Empirical Analysis

671 F.2d 1104 · 1982

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
February 2015
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2015

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn. · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Maher v. Gagne · Miener v. State · Brown v. Bathke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Pjlaintiff s attorney did not have any past experience with such cases, in that when plaintiffs counsel became involved in this matter, he had just recently graduated from law school and could be termed “inexperienced.” In fact, the Court concludes plaintiffs counsel became “experienced” and learned from the proceedings in this matter. For this reason, the Court is of the opinion that plaintiffs attorney spent what this Court believes to be time educating himself, which is commendable, but which should not be charged to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Plaintiffs attorney did not have any past experience with such cases, in that when plaintiffs counsel became involved in this matter, he had just recently graduated from law school and could be termed “inexr perienced.” In fact, the Court concludes plaintiffs counsel became “experienced” and learned from the proceedings in this matter. For this reason, the Court is of the opinion that plaintiffs attorney spent what this Court believes to be time educating himself, which is commendable, but which should not be charged to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “peculiarly within the competence of the district courts, which are intimately familiar with their respective bars.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.