United States v. White’s Empirical Analysis
671 F.2d 1126 · 1982
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2012 · most notably Reves v. Ernst & Young (1993), United States v. Lewis (1985)
18 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 103
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Bates v. State Bar · Quercia v. United States · Barrett v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The record clearly demonstrates that White and Kuykendall manipulated the Co-op’s finances to serve their own personal ends, and that they distorted the Co-op’s records of receipts....” Id. at 1134 . 4 . On January 2, 1982, Russell Brown merged with Arthur Young and Company. After the merger, Erwin was placed in charge of Arthur Young’s Arkansas practice. Later, Arthur Young and Company became Ernst & Young. For the sake of consistency with the earlier opinions in this case, future references will be to “Arthur Young.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.