Haskell v. Colebourne’s Empirical Analysis
671 F.2d 1362 · 1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2002
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 119
Relies on 269 F. Supp. 818 - Monsanto Company v. Kamp · James L. Gianladis v. Gus S. Kass · George B. Spero v. Howard J. Ringold and George Rosenkranz · Brown v. Barton · Borror v. Herz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Scott, as the junior party, must establish that it actually reduced to practice the invention of the count before March 13, 1990, Koyama’s priority date, or that it first conceived the invention prior to that date and proceeded with reasonable diligence from a time just prior to the opponent entering the field toward a reduction to practice, either actual or constructive. 35 U.S.C. § 102 (g).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Scott v. Koyama
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.