Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 671 F.2d 159 - United States v. Rojas

United States v. Rojas’s Empirical Analysis

671 F.2d 159 · 1982

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently May 2012 · most notably United States v. Satterfield (1984), United States v. Blasco (1983)

49 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

4601982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 31 U.S.C. § 1101 (Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010) · 31 U.S.C. § 1105

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Mendenhall · United States v. Watson · Michel v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall be filed ... at the time of departure”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “had been reached. At this point, appellant had unequivocally manifested an intention to leave the United States, and although stepping on the jetport is not the latest temporal point which could be interpreted as the”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “However, nothing in the bill would limit the authority of the Secretary to conduct searches under existing law. Should unreported currency be discovered pursuant to a search by the Bureau of Customs under its existing legal authority, the person transporting the currency would be subject to the penalties under this legislation if the discovery of the unreported currency was incidental to the main purpose of the search.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.