Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 671 F.2d 271 - The State of North Dakota, Ex Rel. Board of University and School Lands v. Cecil Andrus, Secretary of the Interior Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture Frank Gregg, Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management and John R. McGuire Chief of the United States Forest Service, the State of North Dakota, Ex Rel. Board of University and School Lands v. Cecil Andrus, Secretary of the Interior Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture Frank Gregg, Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management and John R. McGuire Chief of the United States Forest Service

The State of North Dakota, Ex Rel. Board of University and School Lands v. Cecil Andrus, Secretary of the Interior Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture Frank Gregg, Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management and John R. McGuire Chief of the United States Forest Service, the State of North Dakota, Ex Rel. Board of University and School Lands v. Cecil Andrus, Secretary of the Interior Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture Frank Gregg, Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management and John R. McGuire Chief of the United States Forest Service’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

5 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2015

5 district · 6 state decisions

801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Quern v. Jordan · United States v. Mitchell · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Montana v. United States · Soriano v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The United States may be named as a party defendant in a civil action under this section to adjudicate a disputed title to real property in which the United States claims an interest other than a security interest or water rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “developed in England as a royal prerogative, it is supported in modern law by the policy judgment that the public should not suffer because of the negligence of its officers and agents”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.