Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 671 F.2d 615 - United Mine Workers of America v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

United Mine Workers of America v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission’s Empirical Analysis

671 F.2d 615 · 1982

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
January 2008
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 2008 · most notably Gatewood v. Washington Healthcare Corp. (1991), Solite Corporation v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and William K. Reilly, Administrator, Epa, the Aluminum Association, Intervenors (1992)

16 federal appellate · 5 district ·

200198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Department of the Air Force v. Rose · Richards v. United States · Southeastern Community College v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “during the physical inspection of any coal or other mine made pursuant to the provisions of subsection (a).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “each underground coal or other mine in its entirety at least four times a year”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) obtaining, utilizing, and disseminating information relating to health and safety conditions, the causes of accidents, and the causes of diseases and physical impairments originating in such mines; 11 (2) gathering information with respect to mandatory health or safety standards; 12 (3) determining whether an imminent danger exists; and 13 (4) determining whether there is compliance with the mandatory health or safety standards.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.