Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 671 F.2d 823 - Leikind v. Schweiker

Leikind v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

671 F.2d 823 · 1982

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2002

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

50198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weinberger v. Salfi · Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co. · Richardson v. Belcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he standard of review under substantive due process is that the statute must be upheld if there is any rational basis for the classification made therein.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.