Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 671 F.3d 553 - Bennett v. Krakowski

Bennett v. Krakowski’s Empirical Analysis

671 F.3d 553 · 2011

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Graham v. Connor · Pearson v. Callahan · Scott v. Harris · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is well-established that an order denying qualified immunity to a public official is immediately appealable pursuant to the collateral order doctrine to the extent that a summary judgment order denies qualified immunity based on a pure issue of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Michigan law provides governmental employees acting on behalf of a governmental agency with immunity from tort liability for injuries they cause during the course of their employment if all of the following are met: (1) the employee is acting or reasonably believes, he or she is acting within the scope of his or her authority; (2) the governmental agency is engaged in the exercise or discharge of a governmental function; and (3) the employee’s conduct ‘does not amount to gross negligence that is the proximate cause of the injury or damage.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'must avoid substituting [their] personal notions of proper police procedure for the instantaneous decision of the officer at the scene'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.