Cuevas v. Grondolsky’s Empirical Analysis
671 F.3d 76 · 2012
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
January 2013
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Davis v. United States · Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont · United States Perez v. Warden Fmc Rochester · Flores-Nova v. Attorney General of the United States.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.