Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 671 N.E.2d 470 - Spriggs v. State

Spriggs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bellmore v. State · Fugate v. State · Kremer v. State · Mullins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) That the officer has probable cause to believe the person from whom the sample is to be obtained has violated IC 9-30-5. (B) That the person from whom the sample is to be obtained has been transported to a hospital or other medical facility. (C) That the person from whom the sample is to be obtained has been involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in the serious bodily injury or death of another. «« (D) That the accident that caused the serious bodily injury or death of another occurred not more than three (3) hours before the time the sample is requested.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Subsection (g) does not apply when the physician is not reluctant to draw the blood sample.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “subsection (g) applies only when a physician refuses to draw a blood sample.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.