Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 671 P2D 160 - Rogers v. Rogers

Rogers v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
6
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2010

9 state decisions

401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · White Motor Corporation, Debtor and Debtor in Possession v. Citibank, N.A. And the Other Bank Creditors Listed on Exhibit 1 · In Re Adams · Color Craft Press, Ltd. v. Nationwide Shopper Systems, Inc. (In Re Color Craft Press, Ltd.) · Willard v. Willard (In Re Willard)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [t]he commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a judicial, administrative, or other proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been' commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title; [[Image here]] (4) any act to create, perfect, or enforce any lien against property of the estate; (5) any act to create, perfect, or enforce against property of the debtor any lien to the extent that such lien secures a claim that arose before the commencement of the case under this title....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Notwithstanding any act of Congress that confers exclusive jurisdiction on a court or courts other than the district courts, the district courts shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of all civil proceedings arising under Title 11, or arising in or related to cases under Title 11.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.