Sharp v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2003
1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Scherling v. Kilgore · Glover v. Berger · Holly Sugar Corporation v. Perez · Craver v. Craver · Wydisco, Inc. v. McMahon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... that the trial court may deny a continuance if the problem which gives rise to the request for a continuance is the fault of the party moving for the continuance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Byrd v. Mahaffey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.