Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 671 P2D 958 - People v. Johnson

People v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

1 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably People v. Thiret (1984), People v. Bossert (1986)

1 district · 32 state decisions

2401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Mendenhall · Beck v. State of Ohio · Rhode Island v. Innis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he time, place and purpose of the encounter; the persons present during the interrogation; the words spoken by the officer to the defendant; the officer’s tone of voice and general demeanor; the length and mood of the interrogation; whether any limitation of movement or other form of restraint was placed on the defendant during the interrogation; the officer’s response to any questions asked by the defendant; whether directions were given to the defendant during the interrogation; and the defendant’s verbal or nonverbal response to such directions.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Admittedly, when a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he has ‘seized’ that person in a constitutional sense.... It does not follow, however, that every personal confrontation between a police officer and a citizen, which results in some form of interrogation directed to the citizen, necessarily involves a ‘seizure’ of the person.... ‘Only when the officer, by means of physical force or show of authority, has in some way restrained the liberty of the citizen may [a court] conclude that ‘a seizure’ has occurred.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.