Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 671 SO2D 1242 - State v. Kerrigan

State v. Kerrigan’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Jones v. Jones (1998), 715 So. 2d 466 - State v. Hardy (1998)

1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

140199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Bearden v. Georgia · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · Jacobson v. United States · 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The burden of proof is on the defendant to raise the defense of entrapment and produce a preponderance of evidence that a state agent induced him to commit the crime. Once a defendant meets this burden, the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was predisposed to commit the crime prior to government involvement. State v. Kerrigan, 27,846 (La.App.2d Cir.4/3/96), 671 So.2d 1242 , citing State v. Hardy, 98-25 (La.App. 5th Cir.5/13/98), 715 So.2d 466 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Where the government has induced an individual to break the law and the defense is entrapment, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was disposed to commit the act prior to first being approached by the government agents. Jacobson v. United States, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.