671 So. 2d 301 - Sutton v. Ashcraft’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2018
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 498 So. 2d 421 - Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Fla. v. Matthews · 539 So. 2d 1153 - Pensacola Jr. College v. Montgomery · 627 So. 2d 46 - Bruner v. Caterpillar, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court shall reduce the amount of [the claimant's] award by the total of all amounts which have been paid for the benefit of the claimant... from all collateral sources”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]here shall be no reduction for collateral sources for which a subrogation or reimbursement right exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“right of reimbursement shall be limited to the actual amount of collateral sources recovered”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.