671 So. 2d 404 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2018
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bernard v. FIRESIDE COMMERCIAL LIFE INS. CO., INC. · 631 So. 2d 103 - Foret v. Terrebone, Ltd. · 575 So. 2d 888 - Burkett v. Property of Douglas · 590 So. 2d 780 - Clulee v. Louisiana Materials Co., Inc. · 633 So. 2d 177 - Bernard v. Fireside Commercial Life Ins.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of which a litigant must be deprived to have a judgment annulled has been defined as the opportunity to appear and assert a defense. Foret v. Terrebone, Ltd., supra .; State, Through Department of Social Services v. Jones, supra . When ill practices are alleged, the court must examine the case from an equitable viewpoint to determine whether the party seeking annulment has met the burden of showing”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is any improper practice or procedure which operates, even innocently, to deprive a litigant of some legal right. Foret v. Terrebone, Ltd., 93-676 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1/25/94), 631 So.2d 103 ; State Through Department of Social Services v. Jones, 94-2605 (La.App. 1st Cir. 10/6/95), 671 So.2d 404 . The”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“) that blood tests would be performed. Id. Counsel for the Department testified that, when a defendant in a paternity case wishes to take a blood test, the typical procedure is to file a joint motion and order for paternity testing, which was not done in the case. Id. In addition to finding that Mr. Jones filed his petition for nullity more than one year after the judgment was rendered contrary to La.Code Civ.P. art. 2004(B) and affirming the grant of the Department's exception of prescription, the first circuit affirmed the dismissal of Mr. Jones' petition for nullity, stating:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.