Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 F.2d 266 - Nelson v. Scully

Nelson v. Scully’s Empirical Analysis

672 F.2d 266 · 1982

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
September 1995
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Wainwright v. Sykes · Morissette v. United States · Sandstrom v. Montana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(t)he question is not whether the trial court failed to isolate and cure a particular ailing instruction, but rather whether the ailing instruction by itself so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a single instruction to a jury may not be judged in artificial isolation, but must be viewed in the context of the overall charge,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a person is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.