Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 F.2d 831 - Doan v. Hudgins

Doan v. Hudgins’s Empirical Analysis

672 F.2d 831 · 1982

Citation profile

224
cited by 224 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 224 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2017 · most notably 134 S. Ct. 1188 - Law v. Siegel (2014), 29 114 75276 Yonikus Yonikus

24 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

6401982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Segal v. Rochelle · Stewart v. Ganey · In re Gershenbaum · Jones v. Burgess (In Re Burgess)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 224 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as a matter of course at any time before the case is closed.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] court might deny leave to amend on a showing of a debtor's bad faith or of prejudice to creditors.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When the bankrupt files an application to amend a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, the court’s only role under Rule 110 [1009] is to decide who should be given notice of the amendment. It does not have discretion to deny leave to amend or to require a showing of good cause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.