Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 F.2d 834 - Spears v. Chandler

Spears v. Chandler’s Empirical Analysis

672 F.2d 834 · 1982

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2008

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

100198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Ballard v. Spradley · Ex parte Dorr · Malinauskas v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prisoners have a constitutional right to `adequate, effective and meaningful' access to the courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.