Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 F.3d 644 - Moormann v. Schriro

Moormann v. Schriro’s Empirical Analysis

672 F.3d 644 · 2012

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. Doe · Ford v. Wainwright · Hill v. McDonough · United States v. Bormes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Supreme Court in Atkins did not define mental retardation as a matter of federal law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.