Jill Stein v. Christopher Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 3 U.S.C. § 5 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Burford v. Sun Oil Co. · University of Texas v. Camenisch · Anderson v. Celebrezze · Burdick v. Takushi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is an extraordinary remedy designed for the limited purpose of preserving the status quo pending further proceedings on the merits....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.