In Re APPLE COMPUTER SECURITIES LITIGATION’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t represents three years of research and development and has undergone extensive testing and design verification during the past year.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e remain pleased with [Lisa's] market acceptance, order rate and dealer enthusiasm. Lisa is clearly being recognized as an important force in the office market.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“more companies are willing to commit themselves to larger orders than Apple has expected.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.