Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 FSUPP2D 1085 - United States v. McCarty

United States v. McCarty’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 49 U.S.C. § 44901 (Aviation Security Act of 2016)

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Leon · Brown v. Illinois · Horton v. California · Michigan v.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “without knowing which photographs of nude children Andrade saw, the probable cause determination cannot be supported unless all of these photographs constitute child pornography — if only some of the photographs of nude children are child pornography, the court has no way of knowing whether Andrade initially saw those photographs as opposed to the photographs that are not child pornography.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “4-5. Color photographs of a nude prepubescent boy appearing to be between the age of 7 to 10, standing beside a stream and covering his genitals with one hand. A portion of the boy's pubic area is visible in both photographs. 6. Color photograph of the same boy in the same location as Plaintiff's Exhibits 4-5, but reaching for clothing. The boy's penis is fully visible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he court cannot conclude ... that the search of the Travel Pro bag was limited to ensuring that it did not pose a safety risk. Rather, the testimony evidences that the TSA employees, at some point, clearly exceeded the scope of their administrative search and began to search for evidence of child pornography.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.