Howse v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2015
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Henderson v. Morgan · Holder v. Hall · Holder v. Hall · Weatherford v. State · Spradlin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“strange indeed that a guilty plea may be accepted without the information as to specific intent required to be given a jury being imparted to the defendant whether by trial court advisement or otherwise,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Patton v. State“there was no suggestion that [he] was even remotely aware that before he could be convicted of attempted murder the State would have had to prove that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Patton v. State“tlhe intent to commit murder may be inferred from the deliberate use of a deadly weapon in a manner likely to cause death or great bodily harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Patton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.