Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 N.W.2d 328 - State v. Evans

State v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Li-Yu Chang · State v. Jacobs · State v. Laffey · State v. Fratzke · State v. Farnum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because there must be a specific intent to threaten, intimidate, or alarm, the only legitimate purpose that will avoid the criminal status conferred by the statute would be a legitimate purpose to threaten, intimidate, or alarm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A person commits harassment when the person, purposefully and without legitimate purpose, has personal contact with another person, with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or alarm that other person....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Intent is a matter that is seldom capable of direct proof. Consequently, we have recognized that a trier of fact may infer intent from the normal consequences of one's actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.