People v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2015
1 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Environmental Protection Agency v. Brown · People v. McCrary · United States v. Needles · People in Interest of RAD · People v. Silvola
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“statutory and rule provisions require a defendant to be given a reasonable opportunity prior to the imposition of sentence to correct or supplement the information contained [in a presentence report] and to rebut sentencing recommendations based thereon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Tuffo“would render a fair and impartial verdict based on the evidence presented at trial and the instrue-tions given by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Garrison“(whithin a reasonable time prior to sentencing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Finney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.