Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 P2D 79 - State v. Lesley

State v. Lesley’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
5
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably State v. Eldredge (1989), Palmerin v. City of Riverside (1986)

2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

22019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. United States · United States v. Hopkins · State v. McCardell · United States v. Jaffe · State v. Pierce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) there appears of record objection to the evidence timely interposed and so stated as to make clear the specific ground of objection, and (b) the court which passes upon the effect of the error or errors is of the opinion that the admitted evidence should have been excluded on the ground stated and probably had a substantial influence in bringing about the verdict or finding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “made no complaint about the juror during the proceedings, but merely moved for a mistrial after the judge recessed court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “trial judge was in a position to gauge the degree, if any, of the juror's incapacity to serve in the trial”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.